Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science
2010 Fall
[Discrete Probability, pmf, cdf, Expectation, Bayes’ Theorem]
To be completed by Monday 18 October, 2010.
Compare your solution with the files listed on the
solution page.
The probability mass function for X = {the number of major defects in a randomly selected appliance of a certain type} is
x | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
p(x) | .09 | .29 | .36 | .21 | .05 |
A test for unacceptable metal fatigue in a girder is not perfect. The test is positive, (that is, the test suggests that unacceptable metal fatigue is present), 95% of the time when unacceptable metal fatigue really is present. The test is positive 10% of the time when there really isn’t any unacceptable metal fatigue. It is known that 5% of all girders at a particular site have developed unacceptable metal fatigue. If the next test result is positive, then what are the odds that that girder really does have unacceptable metal fatigue?
A contractor knows that the probability that it will win a particular type of contract in a particular tender call is p. The value of p is the same from one tender call to the next. Find the probability that the first such contract won by the contractor will occur
The remainder of this question is of a more challenging nature.
A random quantity X that has the probability distribution of part (c) of this question has a geometric probability distribution with parameter p.
Find the cumulative distribution function (c.d.f.)
F (x)
[Hint: you may quote the formula for the
nth partial sum of a geometric series with
first term a and common ratio r:
]
It is desired to measure the direction of flow in a pipe. To do this, a flow meter is used with the information being sent back to the control room via an electrical signal. Ideally, a positive signal level should arrive when the flow is in one direction, (called positive flow) and a negative signal level should be received when the flow is in the opposite (negative) direction. However, because of instrumentation errors, turbulence and system noise, a positive signal level can be observed even if the flow is negative and vice versa. The possible received signal levels are –2, –1, 0, 1, 2. The probabilities conditional on the direction of the flow are as follows:
k | P[signal = k | positive flow] | P[signal = k | negative flow] |
---|---|---|
2 | .5 | .0 |
1 | .3 | .1 |
0 | .1 | .1 |
–1 | .1 | .3 |
–2 | .0 | .5 |
It is also known that positive flow is twice as likely as
negative flow. The operator in the control room must decide the
direction of flow upon observing a received signal level.
The operator always chooses the more likely flow direction.
In other words, upon receiving signal level k, if
P[positive flow | signal level = k] >
P[negative flow | signal level = k],
then take the flow direction to be positive. Otherwise, take
the flow direction to be negative.
Refer back to the final question on
Problem Set 3 and use the labels shown there for
events and decisions.
The following exact probabilities are known:
P[D] = .05
P[N | D] = .99
P[N | G] = .10
Use a separate tree diagram (or use Bayes’ theorem) to
calculate
Place the exact values of the following probabilities, (expressed as fractions in their lowest terms), at the appropriate locations on the original decision tree:
We shall develop this example further, in a future problem set.
In a criminal trial, a prosecutor states that only one in every ten million innocent men have a DNA profile that matches the known DNA profile of the guilty person. The defendent’s DNA profile matches that of the guilty person. The prosecutor goes on to state that the chance that the defendent is innocent is therefore only one in ten million, so unlikely that the jury must find the defendent guilty.
What is the major flaw in this argument?
![]() |
[Solutions to this problem set]
![]() |
||
![]() |