![]() |
![]() |
Checking in the original equation:
x = 4
Þ
LHS = x = 4
Þ
x = 4 is a solution.
x = -1
Þ
LHS = x = -1
Þ
x = -1 is not a
solution.
[x = -1 is the solution to
the different equation
.]
The solution set is therefore
Interval | 2x - 1 | x + 2 | (2x - 1)(x + 2) | ineq. true? |
(-¥, -2) | - | - | + | no |
---|---|---|---|---|
(-2, 1/2) | - | + | - | yes |
(1/2, ¥) | + | + | + | no |
A less efficient alternative is to apply synthetic division, then
to require that the remainder be zero:
R = -16c
- 48 = 0
Þ
c = -3
1 | | 9 | -6 | 37 | -24 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9 | 3 | 40 | 16 | ||
9 | 3 | 40 | 16 | 20 |
1/3 | | 9 | -6 | 37 | -24 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | -1 | 12 | -4 | ||
9 | -3 | 36 | -12 | 0 |
If one does not spot the factoring by grouping, then one may
attempt a second factoring by synthetic division:
1/3 | | 9 | -6 | 37 | -24 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | -1 | 12 | -4 | ||
1/3 | | 9 | -3 | 36 | -12 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 12 | |||
9 | 0 | 36 | 0 |
OR
Taking logarithms (to any one valid base) on both sides of the
equation:
Þ
(2x - 1) log 8 =
log 2 + (x + 1) log 16
But log 8 = log (23) = 3 log 2
and log 16 = log (24) = 4 log 2
Þ
(2x - 1) 3 log 2 =
log 2 + (x + 1) 4 log 2
Þ
3 (2x - 1) =
1 + 4(x + 1)
Þ
6x - 3 =
4x + 5
Þ
2x = 8
Therefore
x = 10:
LHS = 1 + ½ log29
= 1 + log23
=
log22 + log23 =
log26
RHS = log2
(10 - 4) =
log26 = LHS
Therefore
![]() |
![]() |