Faculty of Engineering and Applied
Science
2000 Fall
[Note:
some browsers do not display symbols correctly. Read
“p” as “p”
(pi),
“q” as “q” (theta),
“Ö” as “Ö”
(square root),
“Þ” as “Þ”
(implies),
“Δ as “Δ
(element of),
“ú” as “ú”
(Real),
“-” as “-”
(minus sign).]
1.
Determine whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent or divergent.
State which test you are using.
Let un = (sin n) / en .
The presence of the exponential factor suggests the use of the ratio test. However,
which does not exist. The ratio test therefore fails.
Note that | sin n | £ 1 "n. This suggests a comparison test for S | un | with the reference series bn = 1/en .
| un | £ bn "n and
S bn converges (it is a geometric series with common ratio r = 1/e ; | r | < 1).
Therefore S | un | converges by the comparison test Þ
S un converges absolutely.
2.
Determine whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent or
divergent. State which test you are using.
Then un is of the form (f (n))n , which suggests the use of the root test.
Therefore the series converges absolutely by the root test.
3.
Find the range(s) of values of z for
which the series is
(i) |
absolutely convergent, |
(ii) |
conditionally convergent, |
(iii) |
divergent. |
State which test you are using.
Then, using the ratio test,
Absolute convergence is therefore guaranteed for | x | < 1 and
divergence is guaranteed for | x | > 1.
At the endpoint x = -1:
The series becomes the alternating harmonic series, which is conditionally convergent.
At the endpoint x = +1:
The series becomes the harmonic series, which is divergent.
Converting from values of x to values of z, the series converges for:
-1 £ x < 1
If z + 1 > 0, then we have
-z - 1 £ z - 1 < z + 1
Þ 0 £ 2 z and -1 < 1
Þ z ³ 0 (the convergence is conditional at z = 0 and absolute at z > 0).
If z + 1 < 0, then we have
-z - 1 ³ z - 1 > z + 1
Þ 0 ³ 2 z and -1 > 1
which has no solution.
Therefore the series is
absolutely convergent for z > 0 , conditionally convergent for z = 0 and divergent for z < 0 . |
[Note: The series is also the Maclaurin series expansion of
f (x) = - ln (1 - x),
from which the interval of convergence for x follows immediately.]
4. For the function f (x) = cos x:
f (x) = cos x |
|
f ' (x) = -sin x |
|
f '' (x) = -cos x |
|
f ''' (x) = +sin x |
|
f '''' (x) = +cos x = f (x) Cycle of four |
|
Therefore the Taylor series expansion of cos x about p/3 is
But the first series is clearly the Maclaurin series for cos q, where
q = x - p/3
and the second series is clearly the Maclaurin series for sin q.
Therefore
Both Maclaurin series are valid for all q and therefore for all x.
Therefore the interval of convergence I of this Taylor series is
I = ú. |
and cos B, sin B are the two series in part (b) above.
But A + B = p/3 + (x - p/3) = x
Þ f (x) = cos x = cos (A + B)
Therefore cos (A + B) = cos A cos B - sin A sin B.
In each of questions 5 to 8, find the Taylor or Maclaurin series for the function and discuss convergence.
The simplest route is to quote the Maclaurin series for cos q:
Substituting q = Öx Þ x = q2
,
However, q is real only if x ³ 0.
Therefore the series is valid (and absolutely convergent) only for x ³ 0.
Quoting the Maclaurin series for ez:
and substituting z = 2x and z = -2x in turn, we obtain
Therefore
- OR -
One may find the Maclaurin series for f (x) = cosh 2x from first principles, using the results
f ' (x) = ½(2e2x - 2e-2x) = 2 sinh 2x and
f '' (x) = ½(4e2x + 4e-2x) = 4 cosh 2x = 4 f (x):
f (n)(0) = 2n sinh 0 = 0 if n is odd;
f (n)(0) = 2n cosh 0 = 2n if n is even.
as before, but now a ratio test is needed to establish that the radius of convergence is infinite.
2 - x = 1 - (x - 1)
Þ (2 - x)1/3 = (1 + z)1/3 where z = -(x - 1) = 1 - x .
Thus a Taylor series for (2 - x)1/3 about c = 1 is equivalent
to a Maclaurin series for (1 + z)1/3.
Applying a binomial expansion to (1 + z)1/3:
Therefore
n = 1/3 > 0
Þ The series is convergent for -1 < z £ 1
Þ -1 < 1 - x £ +1
Þ +1 > x - 1 ³ -1
Þ 2 > x ³ 0
Therefore the interval of convergence is
0 £ x < 2 |
- OR -
One could try to find a general pattern for
to substitute into the Taylor series
and one would then need to apply the ratio test to determine the radius of convergence and two other tests to determine convergence at the endpoints, but this alternative method is much more tedious!
As in question 7, it is more efficient to transform to a variable such that the Taylor series becomes a Maclaurin series for which the short-cut of a binomial series can be used.
Let y = x - 2 , then
x - 4 = y - 2 = -2 ´ (1 + (-y/2))
and we need the Maclaurin series (binomial expansion) of
But, when r = 0, (r+1) (y/2)r = 1.
The leading 1 can therefore be absorbed inside the summation. Therefore
n = -2 < -1 Þ the series diverges at both endpoints.
The interval of convergence I is
-1 < -y / 2 < +1
Þ 2 > y > -2
Þ 2 > x - 2 > -2
Therefore
I = (0, 4) |
9. Determine the first five (5) non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series expansion for
First note that the function tan x is an odd function of x. The first five non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series expansion of f (x) = tan x will therefore take us up to the term in x9.
f (x) = tan x |
f (0) = 0 |
f ' (x) = sec2x |
f ' (0) = 1 |
f '' (x) = 2 sec2x tan x |
f '' (0) = 0 |
f ''' (x) = 2 (2 sec2x tan2x + sec4x) |
f ''' (0) = 2 |
= 2 (3 sec4x - 2 sec2x) |
|
f (4)(x) = 2 (12 sec4x tan x - 4 sec2x tan x) |
f (4) (0) = 0 |
= 8 (3 sec4x - sec2x) tan x |
|
f (5)(x) = 8 (12 sec4x tan x - 2 sec2x tan x) tan x + 8 (3 sec4x - sec2x) sec2x |
|
= 8 (15 sec6x - 15 sec4x + 2 sec2x) |
f (5) (0) = 16 |
f (6)(x) = 8 (90 sec6x - 60 sec4x + 4 sec2x) tan x |
f (6) (0) = 0 |
= 16 (45 sec6x - 30 sec4x + 2 sec2x) tan x |
|
f (7)(x) = 16 (270 sec6x - 120 sec4x + 4 sec2x) tan2x |
|
+ 16 (45 sec6x - 30 sec4x + 2 sec2x) sec2x |
|
= 16 (315 sec8x - 420 sec6x + 126 sec4x - 4 sec2x) |
|
|
f (7) (0) = 272 |
f (8)(x) = 16 (2520 sec8x - 2520 sec6x + 504 sec4x - 8 sec2x) tan x |
|
|
f (8) (0) = 0 |
f (9)(x) = 16 (20160 sec8x - 15120 sec6x + 2016 sec4x - 16 sec2x) tan2x |
|
+ 16 (2520 sec8x - 2520 sec6x + 504 sec4x - 8 sec2x) sec2x |
|
|
f (9) (0) = 7936 |
Therefore
[Note: this answer can be verified using a good symbolic differentiation program such as Maple.]
f (x) = ln(cos x)
But we have just evaluated the
first five non-zero terms in the Maclaurin series expansion of f (x)
= tan x. Therefore
But f (0) = ln(cos 0) = ln 1 = 0 Þ C = 0
Therefore
[Return to your previous page]