Faculty
of Engineering and Applied Science
2000 Fall
Note: if you see symbols like ³ or Þ in various places, then your browser is not reading the style sheet for this Web page properly (or the Symbol font is not installed on your computer). The translation is:
- = - (minus) |
Þ = Þ (implies) |
Ö = Ö (square root) |
p = p (pi) |
Ð = Ð (angle) |
q = q (theta) |
But a quotable Maclaurin series is
with absolute convergence on -1 < x < +1 ,
conditional convergence at x = +1
and divergence elsewhere.
Replacing x by -x:
Combining the two series:
But
Therefore
The series is absolutely convergent for -1 < x < 1 and divergent otherwise.
From first principles,
etc.
Upon examining the first few derivatives, one can deduce that
However, this method requires the use of the ratio test to determine the radius of convergence, followed by the limit comparison test at both endpoints x = ±1 to determine the interval of convergence.
Integrating term by term,
From the geometric series, absolute convergence is guaranteed for | x | < 1 and divergence for | x | > 1. However, the limit comparison test is needed in order to establish divergence at both endpoints x = ±1.
a. 4 (5 - j3) - 3 (2 - 7j)
4 (5 - j3) - 3 (2 - 7j) = 20 - 12j - 6 + 21j
= 14 + 9j |
b. (1 - 2j) (3 + 4j) / (4 + 3j)
(1 - 2j) (3 + 4j) / (4 + 3j) = (3 - 6j + 4j - 8j2) / (4 + 3j)
= (-11 - 2j) / (4 + 3j)
= (-11 - 2j) (4 - 3j) / [(4 + 3j) (4 - 3j)]
= (-44 - 8j + 33j + 6j2) / (16 + 9)
= 1.52 - 1.64 j .
c. (Ö2) ejp/2 + 2 e-jp/4
Addition is most easily performed in Cartesian form.
z = (Ö2) ejp/2 + 2 e-jp/4
= (Ö2) (cos(p/2) + j sin(p/2)) + 2 (cos(-p/4) + j sin(-p/4))
= (Ö2) j + 2 ((Ö2)/2 - ((Ö2)/2) j)
= (Ö2) j + (Ö2) - (Ö2) j
= Ö2 |
This addition can be illustrated by a vector addition in an Argand diagram:
a. ((Ö3) - j) (1 + jÖ3)) / (1 - j)
Convert all three factors to phasor (or Euler) form.
Therefore
Remaining in Cartesian form,
(which is inadvisable given the required form of the answer):
Þ z = (1 + Ö3) + (Ö3 - 1) j
Þ | z | 2 = (1 + Ö3) 2 + (Ö3 - 1) 2
= 1 + 2Ö3 + 3 + 3 - 2Ö3 + 1 = 8
Þ | z | = 2Ö2
It takes some work, using trigonometric identities, to prove that
Arg z = 5p/12 exactly.
Therefore
.
b. Ö(12 - 9j) (principal square root only)
z = Ö(12 - 9j) Þ z 2 = 12 - 9j = 3(4 - 3j)
Þ | z 2 | = 3 Ö(4 2 + 3 2) = 3 ´ 5 = 15
Arg (z 2) = Arctan(-3/4)
Þ z 2 = 15 Ð (Arctan(-3/4) + 2np) (n Î Z)
Þ z = Ö(15) Ð (½Arctan(-3/4) + np)
The principal square root occurs at n = 0 (or at any even value of n).
Therefore
One can work in Cartesian coordinates instead:
z = x + yj = Ö(12 - 9j)
Þ z 2 = x 2 + 2xyj - y 2 = 12 - 9j
Equating real parts:
x 2 - y 2 = 12
Equating imaginary parts:
2xy = - 9
Also x and y must both be real numbers.
The real solution to this pair of simultaneous non-linear equations can be shown to be
(x, y) = ±(Ö13.5, -Ö1.5)
The principal square root z must be such that Re(z) ³ 0.
Therefore z = (Ö13.5) - (Ö1.5) j
Þ | z | = Ö(13.5 + 1.5) = Ö15
and Arg z = Arctan(-Ö(1.5/13.5)) = Arctan(-1/3)
Therefore
[By use of the formula for tan 2q, one can show that
Arctan(3/4) = 2 Arctan(1/3).]
Using deMoivre’s Theorem with n = 4:
cos 4q + j sin 4q º (cos q + j sin q)4
Let c º cos q and s º sin q, then
cos 4q + j sin 4q º c4 + 4c3(js) + 6c2(js)2 + 4c(js)3 + (js)4
Equating real parts:
cos 4q º c4 - 6c2s2 + s4
Equating imaginary parts:
sin 4q º 4c3s - 4cs3
Therefore
But csc q = 1/s and c2 = 1 - s2, so
Therefore
z = x + j y , where:
a. z5 = -16(Ö3) + 16 j
[Note: w is in the second quadrant
of the Argand diagram, but
Tan-1x
is in the fourth quadrant when
|
|
The full equation to be solved is, in phasor form,
where k is any integer.
,
or, in degrees,
q = (5 + 12k) × 6°
The principal solution occurs at k = 0.
A set of five distinct solutions is obtained from any five
consecutive values of k, such as
k = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2.
The arguments of consecutive solutions are separated by
In phasor form, an exact solution set in radians is
and in degrees is
Correct to three decimal places, the five distinct solutions in Cartesian form are:
z = { -0.813 -1.827j , 1.486 -1.338 j , 1.732 + j , -0.416 + 1.956 j , -1.989 + 0.209 j }. |
b. z1/3 = 0.6 - 0.8 j
Let w = 0.6 - 0.8 j, then | w | = Ö(.62 + .82) = 1
and Arg w = Arctan (-4/3) » -53.130°
The equation to be solved is
z1/3 = w Þ z = w3 = 1 Ð(3´(-53.130°+360k°)),
where k is any integer.
There exists only one distinct solution, with principal argument at k = 0:
z = 1 Ð-159.39°
Correct to three decimal places, the Cartesian form of this solution is
z = -0.936
-
0.352 j |
[By using various trigonometric identities, it can be shown that this answer is, in fact, exact! : z = -(117 + 44j) / 125]
An alternative method is to stay in Cartesian form throughout:
x + jy = (0.6 - 0.8 j)3 = (3 - 4 j)3 / 53
= ((3)3 + 3(3)2(-4j) + 3(3)(-4j)2 + (-4j)3 ) / 125
= (27 - 108 j - 144 + 64 j) / 125
Therefore
z = (-117 - 44 j) / 125
c. z2 + 12 z = -32 + 4 j
Solving the quadratic equation: |
Completing the square: |
But
Correct to three decimal places:
z = -8.197 - 0.910 j , -3.803 + 0.910 j |
[You can confirm these values using the QBASIC program
"quadgen.exe
"
(source code also available).]
d. z4 + (4 + 4j) z3 + (12 j) z2 - (8 - 8j) z - 20 = 0
z4 + (4 + 4 j) z3 + (12 j) z2 - (8 - 8 j) z - 20 = 0 --(1)
Note that (z + c) 4
= z4 + 4 c z3
+ 6 c2 z2
+ 4 c3 z + c4
Let c = 1 + j , then
c2 = 1 + 2 j + j2
= 2 j
c3 = c c2
= (1 + j) (2 j)
= - 2 (1 - j)
c4 = c2c2
= 4 j2 = -4
Þ
(z + (1 + j)) 4
= z4 + (4 + 4 j) z3
+ (12 j) z2
- (8 - 8 j) z
- 4
Þ
Equation (1) is
(z + (1 + j)) 4 - 16
= 0
,
where k = any integer
Therefore
z = 1 - j , -1 + j , -3 - j or -1 - 3 j |
Additional note:
The four distinct solutions all lie on a circle in the
Argand diagram, centre
|
|
Checking one of the four solutions [not essential]:
If z =
-3 - j, then
z2 = 8 + 6 j ,
z3 = -(8 + 6 j)
(3 + j)
= -18 - 26 j, and
z4 = (8 + 6 j)2
= 28 + 96 j.
Substituting into the left side of equation (1):
(28 + 96 j) +
(4 + 4 j) (-18 -
26 j)
+ (12 j) (8 + 6 j)
- (8 - 8 j)
(-3 - j)
- 20
= (28 + 96 j) + (32 - 176 j)
+ (96 j - 72)
+ (32 - 16 j)
- (20)
= 0 + 0 j
Ö
u = 1 - j and w = (Ö3) - j
[Hint: Write the complex number "u" in the Euler form u = r e j(q + 2kp) = e (ln(r) + j(q + 2kp)), then use the normal rules for multiplying exponents and then use de Moivre’s Theorem.]
In general, to evaluate uw where the exponent w is non-real, express the base u in Euler form (with the magnitude expressed as a real exponential function) but express the exponent w in Cartesian form.
,
where k = any integer.
The Cartesian form is
uw = x + j y =
(R cos Q)
+ j (R sin Q)
This generates an infinite family of solutions, four of which are
shown (correct to the number of decimal places showing) in the table
below. The principal solution occurs when k = 0.
k | R | Q | x | y |
---|---|---|---|---|
-1 | 0.001551861 | -12.5897 | 0.001551438 | -3.6231E-05 |
0 | 0.831008632 | -1.70692 | -0.112773489 | -0.82332101 |
1 | 444.9981882 | 9.175873 | -431.2845791 | 109.6220749 |
2 | 238292.8165 | 20.05867 | 84319.63659 | 222875.8966 |
These values were generated by an
Excel97 spreadsheet.
An updated spreadsheet
to calculate a general uv is
also available.
, where k is any integer.
This is an infinite set of real numbers.
The principal solution occurs when k = 0.
The principal value of j j is therefore
[Back to the Index of Problem Set Questions]
[Back to the Index of Solutions]
[Return to your previous page]