| Instructors | Dr. D. K. Peters | Dr. S. O'Young |
|---|---|---|
| Office hour | Th 12:00-2:00, or by appointment | We 9:00 - 12:00 |
| T.A. | Xiang Fang (Scott) | Brad Whittle |
|---|---|---|
| xfang | bwhittle | |
| Office | EN3075 | EN3075 |
The following is the tentative schedule of lectures, meetings and other deliverables.
| Date | Deliverable | Lecture/meeting | Examples/Handouts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Th 09.08 | Introduction | management.ppt, barriers.ppt | |
| Fr 09.09 | Team Draft, no lecture (only captians attend). | ||
| Tu 09.13 | PIC Microcontroller overview | Motor_Control.ppt,
T8_PIC_Seminar_For_ECE.ppt PIC Lab, (See this errata for important revisions.) Motor Control Lab (This was written for a previous version of the controller card that didn't have the integrated H-Bridge circuits. You will need to make some adjustments to the circuits and instructions.) |
|
| Th 09.15 | Motor control | ||
| Fr 09.16 | Controls | ||
| Tu 09.20 | Incremental Design | ||
| Th 09.22 | Controls (cont'd) | Photo of controller card with labels. | |
| Fr 09.23 | Modularization | Skeleton document (Revised 2005.10.07 what's new) | |
| Tu 09.27 | Computer Vision | ||
| Th 09.29 | Computer Vision (cont'd) | ||
| Fr 09.30 | Review meetings (1:00 - 5:00) | ||
| Fr 10.07 | Demo 1 | ||
| We 10.12 | Documentation Rev. 1 | ||
| Fr 10.21 | Review meetings (1:00 - 5:00) | ||
| Th 10.27 | Guest lectures: Machine Vision | ||
| Fr 10.28 | Demo 2 | ||
| We 11.02 | Documentation Rev. 2 | ||
| Mo 11.21 | Final competition (results) | ||
| Fr 11.25 | Final Documentation, Log books | ||
| Mo 11.28 | peer review. |
| Logbook (individual) | 6% | |
|---|---|---|
| Project: | ||
| Demo 1 | 8% | |
| Documentation rev. 1 | 12% | |
| Demo 2 | 8% | |
| Documentation rev. 2 | 12% | |
| Competition | 22% | |
| Final Documentation | 32% | |
As you can see from above the documentation makes up 60% of your grade for each increment. This grade is broken down as 40% for design and 20% for the documentation itself.
Note that teammates will not necessarily receive the same grade for the project component. The team score for the project will be calculated as above, and each team member's score will be adjusted up or down based on:
Last modified: Tue 2005.11.22 at 16:15 NST by Dennis Peters
